mild hyperparathyroidism: not need surgery
A recent long-term follow-up study suggested that observation was
as good as parathyroidectomy in patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism
(see hyperparathyroid surgery no better AIM2022 in dropbox or
doi:10.7326/M21-4416)
Details:
-- 191 patients with mild hyperparathyroidism in eight
Scandinavian referral centers were randomly assigned to parathyroidectomy (PTX)
versus observation (OBS), from 1998 to 2005
-- baseline: mean age 63, 83% women, BP 140/80, prevalent
vertebral fractures 7%, history of peripheral fractures 25%
-- history of cardiovascular disease 13%/cancer 4%/kidney stone
3%, mean corrected calcium 10.6 mg/dL, mean PTH 91 ng/L, mean creatinine 0.9
mg/dL (no comment on phosphate level)
-- data and causes of death were obtained from the Swedish and
Norwegian registries 10 years after randomization and also after an extended
observation period lasting to 2018; morbidity events were prospectively
registered annually
-- inclusion criteria: untreated primary hyperparathyroidism with
serum albumin corrected calcium levels between 10.4 and 11.2 mg/dL and age
between 50 and 80
-- exclusion criteria: hyperparathyroid bone disease, previous
operating in the neck, creatinine > 1.47 mg/dL, kidney stones, complicating
medical conditions (not explicitly stated), multiple endocrine neoplasia,
familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia
-- spine radiographs were obtained at baseline and at two, five,
and 10 years
-- this article presents the 10-year morbidity data from the
Scandinavian Investigation of Primary Hyperparathyroidism (SIPH), with extended
follow-up to 20 years for mortality
-- prespecified secondary outcomes: morbidity
development, bone mineral density, and quality-of-life were (though no data
presented on these)
-- extended period: mean of 15.3 years, with mean age of surviving
patients at that time being 77 years
-- outcomes measured: effect of PTX versus OBS on mortality
(primary endpoint), and on key morbidities (prespecified secondary endpoints:
cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events, cancer, peripheral fractures,
renal stones, and kidney failure)
-- prespecified indications for PTX in the OBS group included
hypercalcemia >12 mg/dL at two time points, deteriorating kidney function
with creatinine >2.26 mg/dL, kidney stones, parathyroid-associated bone
disease, or patient decision
-- 17 patients in the OBS group had PTX, 4 of
them for prespecified medical indications
Results:
-- all-cause mortality:
-- after 10 years: eight patients with PTX
versus seven in OBS died
-- within the extended observation (mean of
15.3 years): 24 deaths with PTX versus 20 with OBS
-- most common causes
of deaths: cardiovascular, with eight in PTX and nine in OBS, cerebrovascular
disease with five in PTX and three in OBS, and cancer with 4 in each group
-- morbidity events, after 10 years of follow-up: 52 in the PTX
group and 49 in the OBS group
-- peripheral fracture 15 in PTX and 17 in OBS
(predominately 15 wrist fractures and nine proximal humerus fractures)
-- vertebral fractures: seven in each group
-- cardiovascular events: 10 in each group
-- cancer: 13 in the PTX and seven in the OBS
group, mostly from six breast cancers in the PTX group and one in the OBS group
-- cerebrovascular events: five in each group
-- kidney stones: two in the PTX and five in
OBS groups
-- of note, none of the
five patients in the OBS group with kidney stones before being included in the
study developed new kidney stones
-- none of these morbidity events were
statistically significantly different between the groups
--see graphs below: no evidence of splaying of the curves over
time
-- there is concern that mild primary hyperparathyroidism,
frequently picked up by hypercalcemia found on routine testing, is associated
with arterial stiffness, left ventricular hypertrophy, and endothelial
dysfunction, though it is unclear that it is associated with increased
mortality and risk for cardiovascular disease. Some epidemiologic studies have
shown increased risk for cancer
-- hypercalcemia itself seems to be independently associated with
myocardial infarction, perhaps related to calcium deposition in the
vasculature. This current study however did not find any evidence of increased
cardiovascular disease in people with mild hypercalcemia in the setting of
hyperparathyroidism
-- observational studies have suggested that PTX does decrease the
risk of vertebral fractures, but there is a remarkable dearth of information by
well-conducted studies about optimal management of patients with mild
hyperparathyroidism, surprisingly so since this is such a common condition.
-- BUT, prior to this study, there had been no
long-term randomized controlled trials specifically assessing whether
parathyroid surgery benefits patients with mild asymptomatic
hyperparathyroidism in terms of life expectancy or cardiovascular mortality
-- the data from this study found no increased fracture risk in
those with mild hyperparathyroidism who are just observed without surgery, and
surgery does not seem to confer any benefits in terms of mortality or morbidity
in the medium to long-term, despite prior observational data to the contrary
-- a prior study from this group did find modest improvement in
the mental subscales of SF-36 (which measures 8 generic dimensions of health, 4
physical and 4 mental) vs observation, though these differences were minor and
of questionable clinical significance (see doi:10.1002/jbmr.4199)
-- as a sideline here: as noted in above
study, there was no measurement of phosphate levels. i personally have found a
few cases of hyperparathyroidism in patients with normal calcium levels and low
phosphate levels. no data on treatment in these cases, though seems reasonable
to consider these in the above mild hyperparathyroidism category
Limitations:
-- the study was conducted only in northern Europe, so the results
may be different from other areas where diet, vitamin D levels, or other things
that would affect bone health (e.g. medical comorbidities, exercise, obesity,
alcohol or smoking, etc) may be different
-- relatively few men were included in the study, which may limit
generalizability of the results to men
-- the results of this study would only apply to those who meet
the inclusion criteria, and would not necessarily apply to those with serum
calcium levels >11.2 mg/dL, younger than 50 or older than 80, or with the
unspecified "underlying serious medical condition"
So, a few comments:
-- this study provides strong support for “watchful waiting” in
those with mild hyperparathyroidism
-- which is especially great since the surgery does
have potentially serious complications and requires surgeons who have lots of
experience (see https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/2791954
)
-- it has actually been my practice for decades to observe
patients with mild hyperparathyroidism and not refer to surgery, based on very
old studies (all observational and small) that many patients who declined
surgery seemed to do very well decades later, both clinically and in terms or
fractures and stones/renal function. And I have sent essentially none of these
many patients to subsequent surgery.
-- and the caveat here is that in these
patients I avoid meds that increase calcium levels (eg thiazides, but instead
using loop diuretics as diuretics including for hypertension), I carefully make
sure that vitamin D levels are appropriate for the individual (ie, check D and
calcium levels regularly to make sure no increasing hypercalcemia), do routine
bone mineral density assessments every couple of years (and prescribe
bisphosphonates as needed), and encourage lots of liquids (especially in those
with history of renal stones)
geoff
If you would like to be on the regular email list
for upcoming blogs, please contact me at gmodest@uphams.org
For access to the dropbox, go to link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/0bmvtita8mzms11/XDTwHySFFg
Then go to "clinic", then to
"clinical stuff" for articles, or go to https://www.dropbox.com/sh/nyle22q1fn6lkpk/AAB9B2hBj5Kw4gtrJAkI-UF8a?dl=0 for the powerpoint presentations
to get access to all of the blogs (2 options):
1. go to http://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/ to see them in reverse chronological order
2. click on 3 parallel lines top left, if you
want to see blogs by category, then click on "labels" and choose a
category
3. or you can just click on the magnifying
glass on top right, then type in a name in the search box and get all the
blogs with that name in them
or: go to https://www.bucommunitymedicine.org/ ,
a website from the Community Medicine section at Boston Medical Center.
This site does have a very searchable and accessible list of my blogs (though
there have been a few that did not upload over the last year or two). but
overall it is much easier to view blogs and displays more at a time.
please feel free to circulate this to others.
also, if you send me their emails, i can add them to the list
Comments
Post a Comment
if you would like to receive the near-daily emails regularly, please email me at gmodest@uphams.org