DPP-4 inhibitors in diabetics and severe joint pain

The FDA just came out with a warning about DPP-4 inhibitors causing severe joint pain (see http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm459579 ). They reviewed their FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and the medical literature and identified cases of severe joint pain associated with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors, with symptoms starting 1 day to years after starting the DPP-4 inhibitor, and relief of symptoms usually within a month of stopping the med. 

results:
--they identified 33 such cases, all resulting in "substantial reduction in their prior level of activity", and 10 of whom were hospitalized
--in 22 cases, the joint symptoms developed within one month of starting the med
--in 23, the symptoms resolved within a month of stopping the med
--8 had recurrent symptoms on rechallenge with DPP-4 inhibitor (6 of them with a different DPP-4 inhibitor)
--10 of the cases suggested an immunological reaction with fever, chills, rash and swelling.  
--8 of 13 who had immunological testing had normal results, 2 with positive ANA, 1 with increased ESR, 1 with increased CRP, and 1 with antinuclear cytoplasmic antibody (ie, nonspecific)

As a result, the FDA is adding this "Warning and Precaution" to the drugs.

DPP-4 inhibitors (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, which include sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin) are newer agents used in the treatment of diabetes, and data on their efficacy in diabetes is based on their effect on HgbA1C levels (which is pretty minimal at that!!  see blog from june 2015  http://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2015/06/dpp-4-inhibitors-and-cardiovascular.html  which notes that A1c improves only a little, and there is no cardiac protection, a primary clinical endpoint​, even after 3 years in almost 15K people with average age of 66). So, from my perspective these meds are expensive and minimally useful adjuncts to therapy at best, and not surprisingly lead to adverse effects (by blocking DPP-4, they effectively block a ubiquitous enzyme on the surface of most cells and deactivate a variety of bioactive peptides).

Comments

Post a Comment

if you would like to receive the near-daily emails regularly, please email me at gmodest@uphams.org

Popular posts from this blog

HDL a negative risk factor? or cholesterol efflux??

Although the data on HDL being protective of atherosclerotic disease is pretty consistent, there are negative studies, and the data on medications which dramatically improve HDL levels (eg, the cholesteryl ester transfer protein --CETP --inhibitors, such as torcetrapib) are clinically disappointing. there have been several explanations for this. for example, some HDL particles are "pro-inflammatory" and elicit an atherosclerotic response (which may be related to apolipoprotein C-III). a new article in NEJM highlights another angle -- that the issue is not the HDL number, but HDL's functionality in the reverse transport of cholesterol, as measured by the cholesterol efflux capacity (see  lipids HDL efflux capacity vs amt NEJM 2014 in dropbox, or  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409065). This article looks at the Dallas Heart Study, where they measured HDL levels, HDL particle concentrations, and cholesterol efflux capacity in 2924 adults free of cardiovascular disease and followed p
Read more

Drug company shenanigans: narcolepsy drug

I have not done a blog for a long time on drug company shenanigans. So it is my great pleasure to bring up a brand-new drug company approach to garner huge amounts of money (see  https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/28/business/jazz-narcolepsy-avadel-patents.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare  ).  Based on an article by  Rebecca Robbins of the New York Times, who has written several articles on drug company excesses   As background, this will be my 42 nd  such blog: for the array, see  https://bucommunitymed.wpengine.com/page/4/?s=drug+company+shenanigans   Th e drug company  approach  this time  to extending  their  patents has a few “interesting” angles: -- this is a medication manufactured by Jazz Pharmaceuticals to treat narcolepsy: there are 2 versions: Xyrem and Xywav (Xywav has less sodium, so is marketed to those who should be on a low sodium diet). These meds are basically derivatives of gammahydroxybutyric acid (GHB)      -- the drug actually has a pretty
Read more

UPDATE: ASCVD risk factor critique

  I decided to do an extensive update of my prior ASCVD (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) risk analysis and critique of risk calculators, with much more information about the “non-traditional” risk factors. I felt that there should be more data/clarification, since I think we are really undertreating/not preventing the most common cause of death by relying on the ASCVD risk calculators   -- Cardiovascular risk models:      -- many of us rely on the various cardiovascular risk models to determine the appropriate approach to patients, and these are often integrated into the electronic medical records      -- these risk models have several very important limitations:          -- they are typically based on community data, eg from the Framingham study etc. But, in clinical practice, we are dealing with the individual and not the community:              -- there is very clear evidence that there are many individual risk factors that are associated with increased risk of a cardiovascu
Read more