pitavastatin decreases pancreatic cancer and pancreatitis
A recent article suggested
that the anti-inflammatory effects of pitavastatin may prevent pancreatic
cancer by decreasing pancreatic inflammation (see statin dec pancreat cancer
NatCommun2024 in dropbox, or doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48441-8)
Details:
-- see commentary below for
more of the immunology and potential mechanisms
Results:
-- mouse studies assessing chronic
inflammation in the skin and pancreas: they created inflammation and fibrosis,
documented that IL-33 expression was downstream of a specific signaling
(TBK1-IRF-3), and that chronic inflammation depended on IL-33 induction
-- they screened an FDA-approved
drug library to assess the role of small molecules that would decrease IL-33
expression, finding 5 candidates.
-- they found that pitavastatin
calcium was an effective suppressant of IL-33 (as well as the bisphosphonate
zoledronic acid)
-- pitavastatin
suppressed a breast cancer cell line
-- the function
of pitavastatin was independent of its effect on lipids (adding more
cholesterol to the cells did nothing to undercut the benefit of pitavastatin),
though it blocks the mevalonate-mediated TBK1 binding to membrane (which seems
to be required for its phosphorylation and downstream IRF3 activation)
--
atorvastatin, another lipophilic statin, also had the effect of pitavastatin,
though the hydrophilic rosuvastatin did not (perhaps being hydrophilic, there
was less uptake in cells??)
-- pitavastatin
in mice decreased the induced chronic inflammation in the skin and pancreas
(though not in IL-33 knock-out mice), blocked the progression of pancreatic
uors in a pre-cancerous stage, and increased survival of the mice
-- human studies:
-- in 15
matched samples of the normal pancreas pancreatitis, and
pancreatitis-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), IL-33 (and
Interferon regulatory factor-3, IRF3, part of the signaling system noted above)
were highly expressed in the nucleus of the epithelial cells of samples of
pancreatitis and PDAC, with a strong correlation between cells with IL-33 and
IR-3 across the samples
--
epidemiologically, matched cohorts of patients form the TriNetX Diamond Network
(a global health network containing electronic medical record-derived data
from >200 million patients across 92 health care organizations in
North America and Europe) comparing patients on pitavastatin vs ezetimibe
(which does not affect the above cytokine production per the mevalonate
pathway) found:
-- 29% fewer cases of chronic pancreatitis, OR 0.81 (0.729-0.9), p<0.0001
-- 16% fewer cases of pancreatic cancer, OR 0.835 (0.748-0.932), p<0.0013
-- which all suggests that the cholesterol-lowering statin pitavastatin (vs the
cholesterol-lowering non-statin ezetimibe) was able to block the
TBK1-IRF3-IL-33 signaling axis to prevent chronic pancreatitis and thereby the
increased sequela of pancreatic cancer
Commentary:
-- pancreatic cancer has a
terrible prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate <5%. It is the 4th
leading cuase o fcancer-related deaths in Western Countries, estimated to
become the 2nd one by 2030.
-- a recent
analysis found that the incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing, per the
SEER database: https://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2021/12/pancreatic-cancer-increasing-incidence.html
-- chronic inflammation is
associated with many of our current diseases (diabetes, depression, heart disease,
COPD, collagen vascular diseases,…); An approximate 20% of cancers worldwide
are associated with chronic inflammation
-- several
specific chronic inflammatory conditions are associated with a dramatic
increase in cancer, for example:
-- chronic pancreatitis is associated with an eight-fold increased risk of
pancreatic cancer five years after diagnosis
-- inflammatory bowel disease is associated with increased colon cancer
-- hepatitis is associated with increased hepatocellular cancer
-- there are likely several
chronic inflammatory mediators associated with the development of cancer,
including M2 macrophages, mast cells, transforming growth factor-beta,
interleukin 10 and interleukin 13 (all of these have been implicated in promoting
carcinogenesis and chronic inflammation)
-- IL-33 is an epithelium-derived
cytokine, which is a member of the IL-1 cytokine family, and triggers T helper
2 (Th2) cell and type II innate lymphoid cell activation. It serves as a
critical initiator of chronic inflammation when it binds to its
receptor. IL-33 and its receptor are expressed in chronic inflammatory
diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, hepatitis, and
COPD; IL-33 is upregulated specifically during the transition from acute to
chronic inflammation
-- the overall immunology of the
inflammatory response and signaling pathways for IL-33 are quite complex. This
study did find that the TLR3/4-TBK1-IRF3 signaling was the critical
regulator of IL-33, and that blocking this axis prevented chronic inflammation
and cancer sequela in mice with apparent similar effects in humans, per
epidemiologic data
-- it should be noted that IL-33
does seem to have a diverse and complex role across multiple cancers, including
anti-tumor effects reported in human colorectal cancer cells, yet other studies
finding pro-cancer effects in glioma, gastric, and metastases in colorectal
cancers
-- the likely physiologic
explanation to a role of statins in cancer:
-- statins have documented anti-inflammatory and
immunomodulatory affects including including tumor apoptosis, inhibiting
angiogenesis and suppressing tumor metastases
-- statins
inhibit HMGCoA reductase, which affects both cholesterol formation but also the
entire mevalonate pathway
-- the mevalonate pathway also leads to the production of several chemicals
that have been shown to be essential for the survival of cancer cells:
isoprenoids, dolichol, ubiquinone, and isopentyl adenine (see statin dec
pancreat cancer meta-anal DIgLivDis2020 in dropbox, or doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2020.01.008)
-- pitavastatin is a relatively
new statin used for lowering atherogenic risk of lipids, with the following
differences from some of the others:
-- it is pretty
clear that pitavastatin is an effective med to decrease cardiovascular events,
with a recent study in patients with HIV (and, therefore, high risk of chronic
systemic inflammation): https://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2023/09/hiv-infection-pitavastatin-dec-cardiac.html
--
metabolism: it is not significantly metabolized by CYP3A4, and therefore has
different drug-drug interactions than some of the other statins
-- LDL
reduction: pitavastatin 31-42%, atorvastatin 38-54%, rosuvastatin 52-635,
simvastatin 28-41%
-- studies
suggest it has a lower risk of myopathy
-- a 2020 meta-analysis (see statin
dec pancreat cancer meta-anal DIgLivDis2020 in dropbox, or doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2020.01.008
) found that statin use was associated wit a
decreased risk of death in patients with PDAC:
-- 14 eligible
studies with 33,137 PDAC patients for this meta-analysis (only one RCT in the
mix). These were quite heterogeneous studies, making the conclusions less
robust
-- statins were
associated with a 13% reduced risk of death, a 50% reduced risk in surgically
resected patients (presumably with less advanced disease), but no effect in
those with advanced disease (though pretty close to a statistically significant
22% reduction with p=0.07
-- most studies
did not include sufficient data on specific statins used, though, contrary to
the above findings, rosuvastatin was the only one with a statistically
significant benefit (atorvastatin was pretty close, but had very wide
confidence intervals). There are suggestions in the medical literature that the
hydrophilic statins do work better). Clearly, this needs to be studied much
more rigorously
-- the findings of other
medications leading to suppression of inflammation associated with IL-33 is
intriguing but unclear:
-- is
atorvastatin, much more commonly used in the US and a more powerful antilipid
med, as potent as pitavastatin in suppressing IL-33? What about simvastatin?
-- what about
the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid? Or perhaps risedronate (also lipophilic)?
Alendronate is hydrophilic, but does that matter?
-- this study also found that
TBK1-IRF3 activation has been linked to skin cancer. would pitavastatin or
these other meds decrease skin cancer?
-- TBK1 inhibitors may also
improve sensitivity to immunotherapy in several cancers (eg melanoma and liver
cancer). And TBK1 signaling is associated with angiogenesis in several cancers
including pancreatic cancer. would pitavastatin help as an adjuvant therapy?
Limitations:
-- this was largely a mouse-based
study, where the pathophysiology was pretty clearly elucidated
-- the number
of human studies was limited: there were only 15 matched samples in the study
showing that the pancreatic epithelium expressed the same pancreatic cytokines
(IL-33, IRF3) in inflammation and cancer as in the mice
--
So, interesting stuff:
-- it has long been known that
statins have an array of “pleiotropic” effects (ie, not just affecting
cholesterol), including being anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant,
immunomodulatory, improving endothelial dysfunction, and antithrombotic.
-- so it is not
surprising that statins might well be useful for preventing cancer, especially
those cancers that develop in the setting of chronic inflammation
-- there is a
suggestion that overtreating acute inflammation for patients with acute
musculoskeletal pain (eg with NSAIDs/anti-inlammatory meds) may lead to more
chronic pain in the future: https://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2022/05/acute-pain-anti-inflammatories-lead-to.html
-- meds
that decrease systemic inflammation (eg colchicine) may well have a role in
preventing diseases associated with inflammation (MI’s): https://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2024/03/colchicine-decreases-cardiovasc-events.html
-- the
JUPITER study found that in patients with high CRP levels (eg systemic
inflammation) but “normal LDLs” (median 108 mg/dL, which one might argue is on
the high side for their population), that rosuvastatin decreased the level of
inflammation and cardiovascular events (see cad jupiter trial NEJM2008
in dopbox, or10.1056/NEJMoa0807646)
-- so, statins are a reasonable
candidate to be helpful in cancer prevention as well as decreasing the
progression of early cancers
-- the obvious advantages of
statins are that they are plentiful and lots of people are on them for their
lipid effects, they are cheap, and it is great to have a well-tolerated med
that is multifocal: helps with lipids, chronic inflammation, and
-- BUT: there really needs to be
high quality studies confirming this. do statins really work in randomized
controlled trials? Which ones are best, if they do? What about other
commonly-used meds that modulate IL-33 expression?
Comments
Post a Comment
if you would like to receive the near-daily emails regularly, please email me at gmodest@uphams.org