H Pylori, colorectal cancer, and ??general screening
A recent
large-scale analysis found that H Pylori infections may be associated with
colorectal cancer (See hpylori and colon cancer gastro2018 in
dropbox or doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.054
Details:
--4063
incident cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) were compared with 4063 matched
controls without CRC, from 10 prospective cohort studies of very diverse
populations: Southern Community Cohort Study (low-income white and
African-Americans), Multiethnic Cohort Study (Hawaiian, Japanese and those of
European ancestry in Hawaii, and people of African and Latino ancestry in
Los Angeles), Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses' Health Study,
Physicians' Health Study, New York University Women's Health Study, Women's
Health Initiative, Campaign Against Cancer and Stroke (suburban Maryland),
Cancer Prevention Study-II of the Am Cancer Society, and the PLCO study
--information
was available for antibody responses to 13 H Pylori proteins, including
virulence factors VacA and CagA
--confounders
assessed in their analysis included: age, sex, race, education level, BMI,
family history of CRC, previous colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy, hormone therapy,
daily intake of fruit/veges/red meat, aspirin use and diabetes
Results:
--40%
of controls and 41% of cases were H Pylori sero-positive
--though
there were different demographics in the different studies, overall CRC
cases were more likely to be obese, diabetic, former smokers, have a positive
family history of CRC, eat more red meat
--association
of H Pylori and CRC overall:
--white patients: no association, OR: 1.06 (0.95-1.18)
--Latinos: no association, OR: 0.84 (0.55-1.30)
--Asian Americans: trend to association, OR: 1.30 (0.94-1.81)
--African Americans: trend to association, OR: 1.30 (0.97-1.76)
--H
Pylori VacA-specific sero-positivity was associated with an 11% increased odds
of CRC, OR 1.11 (1.01–1.22)
--African Americans had a 45% increased odds, OR 1.45 (1.08–1.95)
--no clear association with Asian Americans, whites, or Latinos
--odds
of CRC increased with level of VacA antibody in the overall cohort (P=.008):
those in the fourth quartile of antibody response to VacA were at a 25% greater
odds of developing CRC, OR: 1.25 (1.07-1.47)
--African Americans odds of CRC also increased with VacA antibody titers
(P=.007): those in the fourth quartile of antibody response to VacA were
at a 70% greater odds of developing CRC, OR: 1.70 (1.12-2.58)
--Asian Americans in the fourth quartile had an 86% greater
odds, OR: 1.86 (1.06-3.25)
Commentary:
--H
Pylori is the most common bacterial infection in the world, infecting 50-60% of
the population
--current
estimates are that 15% of all incident cancers are caused by an infection.
And, H Pylori is the leading infectious carcinogen, associated with 770,000
gastric cancer cases worldwide.
--H
Pylori prevalence is mostly in East Asia, Africa, parts of South and Central America; lower rates in US, Oceania, and Western
Europe
--H Pylori is also pretty prevalent in the US: the third National
Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (1988-91) of 7465 adults found:
overall 32.5% seropositivity, with increases by age (16.7% 20-29 yo, up to
56.9% of >70yo), and by ethnicity/race (52.7% of non-Hispanic blacks, 61.6%
of Mexican Americans, 26.2% non-Hispanic whites. see https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/181/4/1359/856832 ]
--it is also pretty striking that 40% of both
the cases and controls in the above amalgam of studies for CRC were
H Pylori positive
--and from these 10 cohort studies, H Pylori
positivity was 34% in whites, 43% Asian-Americans, 68% in African-Americans,
75% in Latinos
--the
epidemiology of H Pylori is unclear. Likely fecal/oral or oral/oral
transmission. And reinfection seems to be quite uncommon (?related to
immunologic memory, or decreased exposure with aging??). but the finding in the
US of increasing H pylori with age may suggest that younger people are less
exposed to it than the older generation.
--the presumed mechanism for gastric cancer is chronic inflammation (but notably lots of H Pylori infections are asymptomatic).
And studies still suggest both increased risk of
gastric cancer and decreased risk after therapy, even in asymptomatic
people. See http://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2019/04/h-pylori-eradication-and-reduced-risk.html )
--not sure why there is an increase in colorectal cancer, though
this has been found in prior studies/meta-analyses, on the order of 30-50%
increase; there have also been reports of patients having documented H Pylori
on gastric biopsy having more colorectal adenomas and polyps on simultaneous
colonoscopy (on the order of 50% increase)
--one issue is that there are different strains of H Pylori, some
more virulent than others (eg CagA, an oncogenic effector protein, as
well as Vacuolating cytotoxin A or VacA). Given that only a very small
portion of the 50% of the world’s infected population get gastric cancer, it is
important to consider bacteria-specific virulence factors to assess their role in
order to risk-stratify patients (these tests of potential virulence
factors are not generally available)
--VacA is a known gastric cancer virulence factor;
one difference between CagA and VacA is that the former needs to have direct
contact with the host cells, whereas VacA may have effects beyond the gastric
mucosa (and potentially explaining the higher CRC risk).
--another possible mechanism is H Pylori-induced gastric microbiome changes, leading to intestinal
microbiome changes
--this same
research group in the above study has found that in
the southeast US, there was a very high prevalence of H Pylori, and a much higher
prevalence of both VacA and CagA in African-Americans; those with Vac A had an
84% increased CRC risk, and a strong dose-response association of VacA antibody
titers and CRC
--limitations of this study include: no data on antibiotic use
(see http://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2017/04/antibiotics-microbiome-changes-and.html , for a
study finding that antibiotic-induced microbiome changes are associated with
adenomas), no data on whether the patients had symptomatic gastritis, or
inflammatory bowel disease. Also, the data were from blood serology, which
remains positive even after the infection is cured or no longer present. They
also only adjusted for the potential confounders of socio-economic status (only
by education), BMI and smoking status
so, this study refines our understanding of H Pylori and CRC: it
seems that H Pylori infection itself is not so related to CRC, but those with
VacA and a few other proteins have a much higher risk, on the order of 60-80%.
This brings up a few issues:
--perhaps we should be testing for and treating H Pylori
infections regularly:
--one interesting thought is that African-Americans
do seem to get CRC younger than white patients, with some medical societies
suggesting that screening should start at a younger age (see new
guidelines:
http://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2018/04/2-new-colorectal-cancer-screening.html
). The
above finding of higher rates of potentially H Pylori-associated CRC in African-Americans
(who seem to have the VacA protein more frequently) may explain some of this. And perhaps screening
for, finding and treating H Pylori might lower their risk....
--my experience in our health center with patients
coming from endemic H Pylori countries is that it is not worth checking
sero-positivity (it is so high) but i routinely check H Pylori stool antigen,
even in asymptomatic patients. And treat them.
--there are pretty good data that such treatment
lowers the risk of gastric cancer (see http://gmodestmedblogs.blogspot.com/2019/04/h-pylori-eradication-and-reduced-risk.html ). And that the major H Pylori-associated
cancer mortality is from gastric cancer (which seems to be associated with
CagA), so it is not just the CRCs with VacA
So,
seems reasonable to me to look into a strategy of testing and treating all
comers for H Pylori, and getting a better handle on the modes of transmission
in order to prevent new infections….
geoff
If you would like to be on the regular email list for upcoming
blogs, please contact me at gmodest@uphams.org
to get access to blogs since 8/15/17:
2. click on 3 parallel lines top left, if you want to see blogs
by category, then click on "labels" and choose a category
3. or you can just type in a name in the search box and get all
the blogs with that name in them
to access older blogs from the BMJ website, from October 2013
until 8/15/17: go to http://blogs.bmj.com/bmjebmspotlight/category/archive/
please feel free to circulate this to others. also, if you send
me their emails, i can add them to the list
Comments
Post a Comment
if you would like to receive the near-daily emails regularly, please email me at gmodest@uphams.org