non-cephalosporin gonorrhea therapies

as perhaps a follow-up to the last blog on pelvic exams, there was a recent article in  Journal of Infectious Diseases looking at non-cephalosporin treatments for gonorrhea (see gonorrhea noncephalosporin rx JID 2104 in dropbox,or doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu521). this article is important because of the increasing resistance of gonorrhea to multiple agents over the past 50 years (eg, sulfa, penicillins, tetracyclines, cipro). at this time the only recommended treatment by the CDC is cephalosporins (eg, ceftriaxone, since there is too much resistance to cefixime), but there are reports of resistance to ceftriaxone, and it is unclear what to do if the patient has significant cephalosporin allergy. hence the importance of this study, where 401 patients (mean age 27, 35% MSM, and only 10% women, 60% black, 22% white, 9% HIV positive), from 5 sites across the US with uncomplicated GC aged 15-60 were randomly assigned to gentamicin 240 mg IM plus azithromycin 2 gm orally, or gemifloxacin (a 4th generation fluoroquinolone) 320mg orally plus azithromycin 2 gm orally. primary outcome was microbiological cure at 10-17 days after treatment. this study was supported by the CDC and NIH. results:



--202 patients receiving gentamicin/azithro: 100% cure, including 10 of 10 pharyngeal infections and 1 of 1 rectal infections
--199 patients receiving gemifloxacin/azithro: 99.5% cure, including 15 of 15 pharyngeal infections and 5 of 5 rectal infections​ (the one patient who failed therapy probably had a reinfection)
--GI adverse effects were common and pretty similar in both groups: 30+% with nausea, 5% with vomiting, 20% with diarrhea -- the vast majority being "mild". somewhat more GI toxicity in the gemifloxacin arm, though probably the GI toxicity is largely from the azithro



so, these may be important therapies in the future. azithro 2gm has good efficacy as monotherapy, but the concern is that gonorrhea develops resistance to macrolides pretty easily.  the above is clearly a preliminary study. there are concerns about the skew of the patients (eg, very few women), and how easily gonorrhea might develop resistance to these meds (though it is heartening that there was a 100% cure rate, and the likelihood of resistance is probably less with double therapy). but this seems pretty reasonable to me for patients either with cephalosporin resistance or intolerance

Comments

Post a Comment

if you would like to receive the near-daily emails regularly, please email me at gmodest@uphams.org

Popular posts from this blog

cystatin c: better predictor of bad outcomes than creatinine

  another article found significant discordance between creatinine and cystatin C in assessing renal function,  finding that the latter correlated most strongly with both renal and non-renal adverse clinical outcomes (see   ckd cystatin c better than creat AJKD2023  in  dropbox or doi: 10.1053/ j.ajkd.2023.04.002)   Details: -- 158,601 adults who were in the Stockholm Creatinine Measurements (SCREAM) project and had testing of creatinine and cystatin C on the same day during a healthcare encounter, from 2010-2018     -- >400,000 outpatient tests were done for both creatinine and cystatin C levels -- mean age 62, 48% female -- mean eGFR by creatinine (   eGFR cr ) 80; mean eGFR by cystatin C ( eGFR cys  ) 73 -- mean stage of renal insufficiency: 39%  eGFR cr   90+; 38%  eGFR cr  60-89; 12%  eGFR cr  45-59; 7.1%  eGFR cr  30-44; 3.2%  eGFR cr  15-29, 0.7%  eGFR cr ...
Read more

diabetes DPP-4 inhibitors and the risk of heart failure

the FDA just came out with a safety alert about 2 DPP-4 inhibitors and the increased risk of heart failure (released 04/05/2016)(see  http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm494252.htm?source=govdelivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery ​ ). details: --saxagliptin and alogliptin were singled out because of 2 clinical trials in diabetic patients with heart disease. in each trial more patients taking these meds were hospitalized for heart failure vs those on placebo     --in the saxagliptin trial: 3.5% were hospitalized for heart failure (vs 2.8% on placebo). risk factors included prior heart failure or kidney disease     --in the alogliptin trial: 3.9% were hospitalized for heart failure (vs 3.3% on placebo) --recommendation by the FDA:     -- we should consider stopping these drugs if the patient develops heart failure ...
Read more

UPDATE: ASCVD risk factor critique

I decided to do an extensive update of my prior ASCVD (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) risk analysis and critique of risk calculators, with much more information about the “non-traditional” risk factors. I felt that there should be more data/clarification, since I think we are really undertreating/not preventing the most common cause of death by relying on the current ASCVD risk calculators   -- Cardiovascular risk models:      -- many of us rely on the various cardiovascular risk models to determine the appropriate approach to patients, and these are often integrated into the electronic medical records      -- these risk models have several very important limitations:          -- they are typically based on community data, eg from the Framingham study etc. But, in clinical practice, we are dealing with the individual and not the community:          ...
Read more